F1 edges towards engine compromise as V8 push grows
Formula 1's engine wars are inching towards a deal. A phased compromise on the 2026 power-unit split is on the table, even as the calls for a V8 revival grow louder.
Formula 1 appears to be edging towards a compromise on its controversial power unit regulations, but no final agreement has yet been reached.
The F1 Commission met in London on Tuesday, with the FIA confirming only that "minor changes were agreed to aerodynamic and bodywork components".
Behind the scenes, however, discussions about the future of the engines continue to intensify, with further talks expected during this weekend's Monaco GP.
According to reports in Italy, manufacturers are now discussing a phased compromise under which the target 60:40 split between combustion and electric power would not be fully achieved until 2028.
One proposal would increase combustion-engine output by only around 5 percent initially, avoiding a costly redesign of chassis, engines and gearboxes. A full move to 60:40 would otherwise require roughly a 13 percent increase in combustion power.
Another scenario reportedly still under discussion would see Formula 1 switch to naturally aspirated 2.6-litre V8 engines with a small KERS system as early as 2029.
The manufacturers remain divided.
Mercedes and Red Bull are sticking to their existing positions, Audi and Honda are pushing for compromise, Ferrari remains opposed to changes, while Ferrari-aligned Cadillac is reportedly attempting to help build consensus.
The V8 groundswell
At the same time, momentum behind a future V8 formula continues to grow.
FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem is publicly championing the idea, while Formula 1 chief executive Stefano Domenicali recently declared himself "1000 percent" in favour of a return to V8 engines.
Many observers believe action is needed if Formula 1 is to avoid further damage to its image.
A regulation for the bin
Auto Motor und Sport veteran Michael Schmidt described the current regulations as fundamentally flawed and "for the bin".
"Let's be blunt," he said. "The technical regulations are catastrophically poorly written. The 50:50 split between combustion engines and electric power was purely a marketing ploy."
Schmidt argues Formula 1 has already lost the communication battle with fans "if has to explain megajoules instead of horsepower to fans".
"Go out on the street and ask what a megajoule is. Most people have no idea."
The German journalist believes the FIA made a mistake by allowing manufacturers too much influence during the rule-writing process, and "now it is stumbling from one makeshift solution to the next".
"We have to somehow survive this regulation until 2030 and make the best of it," he said.
"I think we're on the right track at the moment. But we have to get the next set of regulations really right."
Related: Cadillac and Domenicali back F1's V8 revival push
4 F1 Fan comments on “F1 edges towards engine compromise as V8 push grows”
💬 Join the conversation — see the latest comments from F1 fans →
Audi, Ferrari, & Honda are reportedly clearly against any fundamental changes in the short term, & Cadillac would probably side with Ferrari.
I couldn’t care less about the 2.6L aspect, but a small KERS-like battery would be interesting, & bringing forward the next change to 2029 would be even better.
Schmidt couldn’t be more right & to be honest, even I was barely aware of megajoule as a unit until this season began.
Honda already have a very very very good 2.2 v6 in indy, they could easily adapt that id have thought, 6 races in, i still couldn't care less about megajoules if im honest, and ev and ice car drivers dont give a damn either Imo
Horner warned about this a good while back and he wasn't the only one. Denying reality is its own reward... for those who enjoy sitting back and watching the reaping of the whirlwind...
Indeed & Max warned just as much.