Helmut Marko denies criticising Mark Webber

Dr Helmut Marko insists pre-season comments he made about Mark Webber were never supposed to be interpreted as criticism of the Australian driver.
Austrian Marko, seen by most as team owner Dietrich Mateschitz's right hand man, said before the 2013 championship kicked off that Webber "can't maintain form" throughout an entire F1 campaign and "has a little trouble with the pressure".
Webber hit back by saying it is obvious he is not "part of Marko's agenda".
Marko's apparent criticism might have gained new significance in the wake of the recent 'Multi-21' affair, where despite the fact Sebastian Vettel ignored team orders in Malaysia, it is Webber's place alongside him that appears most in doubt.
But Marko is quoted by Spain's El Confidential as insisting all the fuss about his pre-season Webber comments was exaggerated.
"First, the interview was conducted in German," he said, "it just happened to be Christmas, and so it was translated into other languages.
"I was asked why Vettel is champion and not Mark, so I tried to explain the differences with some facts.
"I did not think it would be taken as a criticism of Mark," he insisted.
Marko continued: "Mark has always been a driver with a good reputation, and I have always said of him that when he has a good car, he is a winner.
"But when he has a good car, unfortunately for him so too does Vettel. So, psychologically, it must be very hard for him.
"In the circumstances," Marko insisted, "the magazine tried to say that I was against Mark."
Marko made the comments about Webber in an interview with Red Bull's in-house magazine, Red Bulletin.
✅ Check out more posts with related topics:
3 Most Recent F1 Fan Comments
""As we crossed into the new millennium, the average American male (controlled for age and other relevant factors) had a total testosterone reading of 605 nanograms per deciliter. A scant 20 years later, and the average level has plummeted by 27 percent to just 450 nanograms per deciliter. That means the average 22-year-old man today has an average testosterone level roughly equal to that of a 67-year-old man in 2000. The article refers to data from studies in 2007 and 2021, both of which looked at the testosterone levels of men in the United States. In the 2007 study, testosterone decreased by about 22% when comparing 1985-1987 levels to those from 2002-2004. In the 2021 study, researchers found a roughly 25% decrease between 1999 and 2016." Given the comments by some 'males' on this topic, I think we have anecdotal evidence to match the science here folks. Lol smh. Canadian Lumberjack is probably closer to zero! 😂"
"Why does your basis and standard have to be men? Why is adopting a more inclusive standard not relevant? Is your way the only way and everyone has to be comfortable with it? Is no one else entitled to opportunities or the freedom to chase their goals?"
"Actually, Jax, I am drawing from a life-time of experience, and not some shallow, vapid need to virtue signal. I have witnessed women do work of equal or better value than their male counterparts in a number of demanding professions: geology, soldier, helicopter pilot."